Table 3

Drug treatment options for post-viral olfactory dysfunction

AuthorYearStudy designNo of participantsInterventionsMeasuresOutcomesNumerical results
Nguyen et al1152018Randomised controlled trial138Olfactory training with saline irrigations or olfactory training with budesonide irrigationsUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification testPercentage of patients with clinically relevant improvement in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification test (change in score of ≥5)Odds ratio 2.1 (95% confidence interval1.03 to 4.41), P=0.039
Blomqvist et al1162003Double blind, randomised controlled40Flutucasone oroprionate v placebo v controlButanol odour testPercentage of patients with at least two step improvement in butanol odour testNo significant difference (P>0.05)
Schepens et al1182022Double blind, randomised controlled115Prednisolone 40 mg once daily for 10 days v placeboSniffin' Sticks testMedian threshold discrimination identification scoreThreshold discrimination identification: placebo median 26.8 (interquartile range 23.6-29.3) v intervention median 28.8 (24.0-30.9), P>0.05
Philpott et al1192017Double blind, randomised controlled55Sodium citrate nasal spray v placeboOlfactory thresholds for palmitoylethanolamide over 2 hoursImprovement in palmitoylethanolamide thresholdControl median threshold 0 (interquartile range 0-0.5); intervention median threshold 1 (0-2), P=0.014
Whitcroft et al2016Single blind, controlled trial49Topical sodium citrate v placeboSniffin' Sticks testChange in composite threshold and identification scoresMean change in score: sodium citrate 0.33 (standard deviation 2.34); placebo −0.54 (2.62); mean difference 0.87 (2.68); P=0.04
Whitcroft et al1202021Controlled trial60Topical sodium citrate v placeboSniffin' Sticks testChange in composite threshold discrimination identification score for quantitative loss; percentage of patients reporting qualitative lossNo significant difference in mean change in threshold discrimination identification score; no significant difference in total number of patients reporting qualitative loss
Hummel et al1222017Retrospective, cohort170Topical vitamin A plus olfactory training v olfactory training aloneSniffin' Sticks testPercentage of patients achieving a clinically significant improvement in threshold discrimination identification score (defined as +5.5 points)Intervention group 37% v control 23% (χ2 7.06, degrees of freedom=2, P=0.03)
Reden et al1232012Double blind, randomised controlled52Oral vitamin A v placeboSniffin' Sticks testMean threshold discrimination identification scoreMean threshold discrimination identification: intervention group 18.34 (standard error of the mean 1.42); placebo group 20.11 (1.43); P=0.47
di Stadio et al1242022Double blind, randomised controlled185Oral PEA-LUT plus olfactory training v olfactory training aloneSniffin' Sticks testMean threshold discrimination identification scoreMean threshold discrimination identification: intervention group 29.8 (standard deviation 7.5); control group 19.5 (7.3); P<0.001
Yan et al1272022Prospective, randomised controlled trial87Oral omega 3 supplementation plus nasal rinse v nasal rinse aloneUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification testPercentage of patients with clinically significant olfactory loss (≥10% reduction of University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification test scores v patient's own baseline)Intervention group 4.3% v control 24.4% (P=0.01)
Yan et al1252020Case series7Intranasal injection of platelet rich plasmaSniffin' Sticks testMean threshold discrimination identificationMean threshold discrimination identification: pre-treatment 23.6 v post-treatment 19.5, P=0.026
Yan et al1262022Randomised controlled trial35Three intranasal injection of platelet rich plasma plus budesonide rinse v three intranasal saline injections plus budesonide rinseSniffin' Sticks testChange in mean threshold discrimination identification versus baselineMean change from baseline: intervention group 6.25 points (95% confidence interval 3.85 to 8.65) (P<0.001) v control group 1.17 points (−1.99 to 4.32) (P>0.05)
Garcia et al1282022Case series12Gabapentin, up titrated from 100 mg to 600 mg, once daily plus olfactory training and budesonide rinseSubjective assessment of parosmiaSubjective assessment of severity of parosmiaImprovement in 8 of 12 patients